[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Emulsion Stability and Testing

Particle Sciences - Technical Brief: 2011: Volume 2
PDF Version

Emulsions encompass a vast number of everyday materials and products including foodstuffs, personal care items, and pharmaceuticals. Topical emulsions of both the oil-in-water (O/W) and water-in-oil (W/O) types are commonly used to improve aesthetics and ease of application. Emulsions may also be used to deliver multiple active pharmaceutical ingredients (API’s) of differing solubility’s, or present an API in a format that improves the distribution and/or permeation on application, or improve patient compliance for aesthetic reasons. However, as emulsions are inherently thermodynamically unstable, understanding the theoretical factors influencing emulsion stability is critical to the emulsion formulator.

Emulsion Stability

The process by which an emulsion completely breaks (coalescence), i.e., the system separates into bulk oil and water phases, is generally considered to be governed by four different droplet loss mechanisms, i.e., Brownian flocculation, creaming, sedimentation flocculation and disproportionation, shown schematically in Figure 1. The first three are the primary methods by which emulsions are destabilized but all four processes may occur simultaneously and in any order1, 2.

The processes of creaming, flocculation and coalescence are well demonstrated by taking an emulsion of limited stability and centrifuging it at low speeds or various lengths of time. Initially, for oils with a density less than water (this will be assumed unless otherwise noted in this Technical Brief), a “rising” of the cream is observed. Then, as larger droplets rise and concentrate, they begin to appear at the top. Finally, the drops coalesce to form a separate layer of oil on top.

Creaming derives its name from the most commonly known example of a de-emulsification process – the separation of milk into its cream and skim milk components. Creaming is not an actual breaking but a separation of the emulsion into two emulsions, one of which (the cream) is richer in the disperse phase than the other. Creaming is the principal process by which the disperse phase separates from an emulsion and is typically the precursor to coalescence.

The creaming rate (or settling rate for disperse phases more dense than the continuous phase) can be estimated from the Stokes’ equation:

where, υ is the creaming (settling) rate, r is the droplet radius, ρ is the density of the droplet, ρo is the density of the dispersion medium, η is the viscosity of the dispersion medium (continuous phase) and g is the local acceleration due to gravity.

The density difference, (ρ – ρo), is negative for creaming (an O/W emulsion) but positive for settling (a W/O emulsion). The Stokes’ equation shows that creaming is inhibited by a small droplet radius, a highly viscous continuous phase and a low density difference between the oil and water phases. Substituting “typical” values into the equation, i.e., r ~ 1 μ, Δρ ~ 0.2 g·cm-3 and η ~ 1 mPa·s gives a creaming rate of ~ 5 cm per day which is not insubstantial. A creaming rate of < 1 mm per day is considered negligible.

Flocculation can be generally defined as the aggregation of droplets to give 3-D clusters without coalescence occurring. Importantly, all droplets maintain their own integrity and remain as totally separate entities. It results when there is a weak, net attraction between droplets and arises through various mechanisms3-5 the discussion of which is beyond the scope of this Technical Brief.

Flocculation may be subdivided for convenience into two general categories: that resulting from sedimentation aggregation and that from Brownian motion aggregation of the droplets. In polydisperse (“real”) emulsions, droplets of different size cream at different rates and this leads to a tendency for the faster-moving (larger) droplets to collide with and potentially trap, slower moving smaller droplets. In sedimentation aggregation it is assumed that all the paths in sedimentation are vertically linear; Brownian aggregation is the result of random Brownian movement of the droplets. In both cases a frequency factor for sedimentation encounters can be defined4. Both processes occur simultaneously in a typical emulsion and so cannot be rigorously separated. Nevertheless, an estimate of the relative rates of each type of flocculation can be made6 from:

where kb is the Boltzmann constant and T is absolute temperature (Kelvin).

When Γmax >10, Brownian aggregation is negligible; when Γmax < 0.1 sedimentation aggregation is negligible.

Because the magnitude of the forces involved is different for the two flocculation processes, the structure of the 3-D droplet clusters is different.

Finally, flocculation may also be divided into fast flocculation and slow flocculation7. The former occurs when the smaller droplets disappear more rapidly than the larger ones as a result of the different rates of movement under gravity or in forced convection, leading to an increased collision rate (orthokinetic aggregation). The latter occurs when the build-up of large metastable structures slows first as a result of the energy barrier between droplets and then the formation of droplet-free spaces between aggregates and the heavier aqueous phase O/W emulsions; the consequence is called hindered creaming.

Disproportionation is a process – often referred to as Ostwald ripening – that is dependent on the diffusion of disperse phase molecules from smaller to larger droplets through the continuous phase. The pressure of dispersed material is greater for smaller droplets than larger droplets as shown by the Laplace equation:

where, P is the Laplace pressure, γ is the surface tension and r is the droplet radius.

This pressure differential between small and large droplets constitutes the driving force for diffusion, but the rate of diffusion depends on the solubility of the dispersed phase in the continuous phase. The higher the disperse phase volume, the greater its relative vapor pressure (and thus the solubility) will be, as given by the Kelvin equation:

where, P is the vapor pressure of the liquid droplet, Po is the vapor pressure of the bulk liquid, γ is the surface tension, r is the droplet radius and V is the molar volume of the disperse phase.

The diffusion rate is also impacted directly by the viscosity of the continuous phase as described by the Stokes-Einstein equation:

where, D is the diffusion coefficient of a droplet and η is the continuous phase viscosity.

The measurement of both the droplet size and size distribution of emulsions is a critical metric. A variety of sizing techniques are available (see PSI Technical Brief 2009 Volumes 6 and 7) but, from Figure 1, it is obvious that image analysis (for regular emulsions) should be a prime candidate.

Emulsion Stability Testing

Stability testing is an integral part of emulsion development work. A discussion of drug stability testing methods and kinetics is beyond the scope of this Technical Brief and the reader is referred to the many excellent books and review papers on this subject8-10.

The emulsion formulator is generally concerned with understanding the effects of storage and shipping conditions on shelf-life which may include extremes of temperatures and exposure to sunlight, vibration and humidity. Hence, formulations are stored under standardized test conditions and carefully examined at periodic intervals. Table 1 lists general conditions commonly and historically used to evaluate emulsion stability, though regulated emulsion products must be tested in compliance with applicable ICH guidelines. Further, although freeze-thaw has been widely used as an accelerated path to judge emulsion stability, it is not truly appropriate to rely solely on it to make those judgements. The cycling of temperature in freeze-thaw experiments affects parameters other than those that directly relate to creaming which is the actual mechanism of emulsion instability.

Laboratory batches are generally stored in glass jars to evaluate the inherent stability of the emulsion. The use of glass jars permits easy observation and physical measurements at regular intervals. However, ultimately the emulsion must also be evaluated in the intended final packaging, as this may impact the stability due to interfacial wetting behavior, permeation, or leaching of components into or out of the packaging material. Table 2 lists properties that are important to fully understand, including the characteristics and stability of an emulsion formulation. The number of properties is quite extensive, and all the instrumentation required may not be available to many formulators. Ideally, all these tests should be conducted on final formulations but it is not practical, nor necessary, to conduct the total battery of tests on all preliminary formulations. Typically, initial formulations are screened for changes in pH, viscosity, flow behavior, odor and physical separation at elevated temperatures.

Emulsions have a long history of use and are widely used in many products encountered in everyday life. Understanding the theoretical considerations in emulsion formulation and having the ability and proper instrumentation to fully characterize and monitor stability of an emulsion system is highly beneficial to provide a superior product in a more time efficient manner.

References

  1. P. Becher, Emulsions: Theory and Practice, Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York (1957)
  2. P. Becher (Ed), Encyclopedia of Emulsion Technology, Volume 1: Basic Theory, Marcel Dekker, New York (1983)
  3. C. Cowell and B. Vincent, J. Colloid and Interface Science, 87 518 (1982)
  4. E. Dickinson and G. Stainsby, Colloids in Food, Applied Science Publishers, London (1982)
  5. E. D. Goddard and B. Vincent (eds), Polymer Adsorption and Dispersion Stability, ACS Symposium Series 240, America Chemical Society, Washington DC (1984)
  6. S. R. Reddy and H. S. Olger, J. Colloid and Interface Science, 79 105 (1981)
  7. M. A. J. S. van Boekel and P. Walstra, Colloids and Surfaces, 3 99 (1981)
  8. K. A. Connors, G. L. Amidon and J. S. Valentino, Chemical Stability of Pharmaceuticals: A Handbook for Pharmacists, John Wiley, New York (1986)
  9. W. Grimm and K. Krummen (eds), Stability Testing in the EC, Japan and the USA: Scientific and Regulatory Requirements, Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart (1993)
  10. J. Wells, Pharmaceutical Preformulation: The Physicochemical Properties of Drug Substances, Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1988)

 

Particle Sciences is a leading integrated provider of formulation and analytic services and both standard and nanotechnology approaches to drug development and delivery.

3894 Courtney Street, Suite 180
Bethlehem, PA 18017
610-861-4701
www.particlesciences.com